SMSF Borrowing
Strategies
The announcement of new provisions for permitting self-managed
superannuation funds (SMSF) to borrow was greeted with surprise,
speculation and suspicion.
Originally expected to cover only traditional instalment warrant
arrangements, the new legislation that came into effect on 24 September
2007, clearly applied far more widely. Was it a mistake? Would the new
government over-turn it? How would the ATO react?
One year on, we have seen the following:
- No signs that the current
government will seek to repeal this legislation.
- An ATO taxpayer alert that
provides guidance of the ATO’s views on arrangements, which may concern
them (and confirmation of arrangements, which fit within the
guidelines).
- Banks, legal practitioners and
advisers setting up documentation to enable straight forward and more
elaborate borrowing arrangements.
In this article we look at the
basic conditions of the legislation, some typical borrowing arrangements
and some issues to watch out for.
Basic Conditions for SMSF Borrowing
Section 67 of the SIS Act sets out the prohibition on borrowing, which
applies for a superannuation fund. It then sets out the exceptions to this
prohibition, and the new rules are contained at section 67(4A) as one of
the exceptions.
Under the new law a super fund is not prohibited from borrowing money or
maintaining a borrowing of money, providing the arrangement entered into
satisfies each of the following conditions:
- The borrowed monies are used to
acquire an asset that the fund is not otherwise prohibited from
acquiring.
- The asset acquired (or a
replacement asset) is held by a security trustee under a bare trust
arrangement so that the fund receives a beneficial interest in the
asset.
- The super fund has the right to
acquire legal ownership of the asset (or, if applicable, the replacement
asset) by making one or more payments after acquiring the beneficial
interest.
- Any recourse that the lender
has under the arrangement against the super fund is limited to rights
relating to the asset acquired (or, if applicable, the replacement
asset). That is, the lender is able to have the right to recover monies
where there is a default on the borrowing by repossessing or disposing
of the asset acquired, but cannot have the right to recover such monies
through recourse to the fund’s other assets.
Arrangements which may be
allowed under the new rules
The following diagram illustrates a basic borrowing arrangement, where
monies are borrowed from a lender (a bank or a related party) and are used
to acquire an asset in the name of a security trustee under a bare trust
arrangement where the fund beneficially owns the asset.

|
Alternative
arrangements Provided
the basic conditions are met, the lender may be a related party. Related
party lenders may lend their own cash to the fund under a super fund
borrowing arrangement. Alternatively, a related party lender may borrow
money on a full recourse basis (using a non-super asset as security) and
on-lend this money to the fund on a limited recourse basis.
LVR limits
There are no limits imposed by legislation on the ratio of the loan amount
to the value of the underlying asset acquired. However, bank lenders will
typically impose lower loan to value ratios (LVRs), unless they can obtain
personal guarantees to offset their risk (see warning about personal
guarantees), or charge significantly higher interest rates. Related party
lenders will perhaps be more flexible about LVRs. However, this should be
reflected in the loan terms, otherwise, the loan may not be on commercial
terms.
Issues to watch out for
Personal Guarantees: it is important to ensure that where personal
guarantees are required to support super fund borrowing, the guarantor has
no right of indemnity to the super funds assets, (which would normally be
the case unless this right is specifically removed).
Commercial Terms: the ATO taxpayer alert highlighted potential
concerns where loans are made on terms, which are not arms length. Care
should be taken for related party loans, to ensure that interest rates are
appropriate, and reflect what may be available commercially.
Fund Compliance Requirements: a full review of the fund’s
investment objectives, investment strategy and trust deed should be
undertaken prior to entering into a borrowing arrangement. Issues to look
for include:
- Whether the proposed
arrangement fits the fund’s investment objectives?
- What impact the gearing
arrangement will have on the fund’s future cash flow?
- Whether the fund’s trust deed
allows borrowing?
- Whether the fund’s trust deed
or investment strategy allows beneficial ownership of fund assets?
It seems likely that SMSF
borrowing arrangements are here to stay and that the industry will
continue to grow in confidence in advising clients on using gearing within
superannuation funds to help clients achieve their wealth creation
objectives.
Disclaimer:
The material should not be relied upon. Supermatters, any
Australian Member, any related entity of those persons, or any of their
officers employees or representatives, will not be liable for any loss or
damage arising out of or in connection with the material contained in this
publication.
|